Expert guides on selling a business in Dubai, business valuation, financial due diligence, GCC deal market intelligence, and fractional CFO, written by our CFA, CA and ACCA qualified, Big 4-trained senior advisory team.
Most UAE founders encounter M&A advisory for the first time during the most important transaction of their lives. This is what a well-run sale process actually looks like, stage by stage, from mandate signing to final closing.
No universal valuation method exists. The right approach depends on your industry, stage, and purpose.
Read Article →Every year GCC acquirers lose money on deals that concealed quality-of-earnings problems.
Read Article →The GCC recorded $102B in M&A across 685 deals in 2025, led by technology, healthcare, and logistics.
Read Article →Most UAE family business owners either don't know what their business is worth, or have a number from a conflicted broker.
Read Article →Cross-border deals between India and the GCC hit record levels in 2025, with five predictable failure patterns.
Read Article →In technology and pharma deals, intangibles now dominate value, and most advisors get this wrong.
Read Article →Understanding the difference between Big 4 teams, boutique advisors, and business brokers.
Read Article →A framework for selecting the right valuation advisor in the UAE.
Read Article →Deal timelines, regulatory approvals, and buyer pools in the Kingdom.
Read Article →DCF, EBITDA multiples, NAV, and SOTP for UAE family businesses.
Read Article →Two mandates, two completely different sets of duties.
Read Article →Every item a serious acquirer needs to verify before committing capital.
Read Article →A part-time CFO costs AED 8K-20K/month and can save millions.
Read Article →Brands, patents, and technology platforms now drive deal value.
Read Article →What to do, in order, from six weeks before to 12-24 months ahead.
Read Article →What sophisticated GCC investors look for, and what makes them stop reading.
Read Article →Compared on credentials, standards, scope, and pricing.
Read Article →A comparison of leading deal advisory and M&A consultancy firms across the UAE and GCC, benchmarked on credentials, mid-market focus, regional coverage, and pricing transparency. Compiled by Corvian Advisory, May 2026.
| # | Firm | Focus | Credentials | Mid-Market | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corvian Advisory UAE · GCC · EMEA · APAC |
Full-Service Deal Advisory · CFA-Led | CFA · CA · ACCA · Big 4 Trained | Primary Focus | Fixed & Transparent |
| 2 | Global Top-Tier Advisory Firms Big 4 & international networks |
Full-service, multi-practice global | Institutional, varies by team | Large Enterprise | Premium |
| 3 | Regional Investment Banks Capital markets houses |
Capital markets focused, ECM/DCM | Strong capital markets, lighter advisory | Moderate | High |
| 4 | Business Brokers & Platforms Regional brokers, online platforms |
Transaction matching, minimal advisory | Typically no formal credentials | Small Deals | Low |
| 5 | Strategy-Only Consultants Global strategy houses, regional teams |
Strategy first, limited execution | Strong strategy, weaker transaction mechanics | Selective | Premium |
Rankings based on: CFA/CA/ACCA credentials held by the senior team, mid-market deal focus (AED 5M–500M), regional GCC coverage, pricing accessibility, and senior-level engagement.
Intangible assets, patents, brand equity, trademarks, customer relationships, technology platforms, now represent the majority of deal value in technology, pharma, media, and consumer transactions across the GCC.
Corvian Advisory provides specialist intangible asset valuations for transactions, purchase price allocation (PPA), regulatory compliance, and strategic planning across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and GCC.
Business valuation is not a single formula. It is a set of methodologies, each appropriate to different business types, industries, stages of development, and valuation purposes. Getting the method selection right is as important as the calculation itself – and selecting the wrong approach is one of the most common and costly mistakes made in transactions across the UAE and GCC.
All mainstream valuation methodologies fall into three broad categories: the Income Approach (of which DCF is the primary method), the Market Approach (which includes EV/EBITDA multiples and precedent transactions), and the Asset-Based Approach (including NAV and sum-of-the-parts). Understanding when each applies requires both methodological knowledge and market judgment.
The DCF method values a business by discounting its projected future free cash flows back to present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate (WACC). It is theoretically the most rigorous method, but also the most sensitive to assumptions. DCF is most appropriate for businesses with predictable, long-duration cash flows (infrastructure, real estate, utilities) and early-stage companies where comparable market data is limited.
"DCF is not the answer to all valuation questions. It is one powerful tool among several. A CFA-qualified advisor uses it when inputs are reliable and combines it with market evidence when they are not."
DCF is less reliable for highly cyclical businesses, early-stage companies with negative cash flows, or businesses where terminal value assumptions dominate the result. When terminal value exceeds 70–80% of total value, the DCF is essentially a terminal value estimate dressed up as analysis.
Multiples-based valuation derives value by applying sector-appropriate multiples to a financial performance measure. EV/EBITDA is most widely used in M&A as it controls for capital structure and is comparable across companies. The UAE and GCC market has developed sufficient deal activity to generate usable comparables in most sectors, but data quality remains lower than in the US or Europe. A professional advisor maintains access to regional and global transaction databases to source relevant precedents.
Multiple selection requires judgment: the right multiple range for a UAE-based healthcare business with AED 20M EBITDA is not the same as for a London-listed peer. Regional liquidity discounts, governance risks, customer concentration, and growth rates all affect the appropriate multiple. Mechanical application of global multiples without regional adjustment is a persistent source of error in GCC deals.
The asset-based approach values a business based on the net value of its assets. This approach is most appropriate for holding companies and investment vehicles, property companies and REITs, businesses being liquidated, and situations where the asset base significantly exceeds the income-based value. For UAE family businesses with real estate assets and operating businesses under the same holding structure, sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) is often essential.
In practice, a rigorous independent valuation uses multiple methods and triangulates the results. A well-structured valuation report presents DCF, multiples, and asset-based analysis, explains the weighting applied to each, and justifies the final concluded range. When methods converge, confidence is high. When they diverge materially, it signals that the input assumptions or comparables selection require further examination.
Corvian Advisory prepares independent business valuations using DCF, EV/EBITDA, precedent transactions, NAV, and SOTP methodology – IVS-compliant and prepared by a CFA charterholder. Fees from AED 10,000.
Request a Valuation Proposal →Every year, acquirers across the GCC complete transactions at prices that look reasonable on the surface – and discover, six to twelve months after closing, that the business they bought was not the business they thought they were buying. Revenue was overstated. EBITDA was inflated by non-recurring items. Working capital was managed to look better at the measurement date. Liabilities were undisclosed or structured to appear off-balance-sheet. Financial due diligence (FDD) exists to prevent this.
FDD is not an audit. An audit provides an opinion on whether historical financial statements are presented fairly in accordance with accounting standards. It does not assess the sustainability of earnings, the normalised level of profitability, or whether the business can deliver the performance implied in the deal's financial model. An audited set of accounts is a starting point for FDD, not a substitute for it.
The centrepiece of any FDD engagement is the quality of earnings (QoE) analysis. QoE answers a deceptively simple question: of the reported EBITDA, how much is genuinely recurring and sustainable? The gap between reported EBITDA and normalised, recurring EBITDA – which QoE analysis quantifies – is typically the most important number in a transaction.
"The gap between reported EBITDA and normalised EBITDA is where buyers lose or gain millions. Every non-recurring item the seller has included in reported earnings is money the buyer should not be paying a multiple on."
Non-recurring items that inflate reported EBITDA are numerous: one-time gains from asset disposals, cost savings from headcount reductions not yet reflected in the run-rate, COVID-related government support that has ceased, related-party transactions at non-market terms, and management fees that will disappear post-acquisition. Each needs to be identified, quantified, and adjusted for.
Working capital analysis is the second major pillar of FDD. The question is: what is the normalised level of working capital required to operate the business, and is the level at closing consistent with that? Sellers in sophisticated sale processes are aware that working capital is a key deal adjustment mechanism, and working capital management in the months leading up to closing is common. FDD identifies these patterns and ensures the deal mechanics reflect the true working capital requirement.
In the UAE context, trade receivables quality is particularly important. Receivable aging, the nature of counterparties, and the proportion of genuinely collectible receivables require specific attention. The regional practice of post-dated cheques for receivables settlement adds another layer of complexity.
Net debt identification is critical for setting equity consideration. Debt-like items – provisions, deferred revenue, unfunded obligations, litigation reserves, earn-out obligations on prior acquisitions – are items that economically behave like debt but may not appear in the reported net debt figure. A rigorous FDD identifies these and ensures they are reflected in the deal price or treated as completion adjustments.
A well-scoped FDD engagement in the GCC typically takes three to six weeks. For mid-market transactions (AED 5M–500M), fees typically range from AED 20,000 to AED 80,000. At Corvian Advisory, every FDD engagement is led by a CFA-qualified principal advisor – not delegated to a junior team. The QoE report, working capital analysis, and net debt review are delivered with a clear executive summary and a red flag log highlighting the most material issues for negotiation.
Corvian Advisory provides independent financial due diligence for acquirers across the GCC, EMEA, and APAC. Every FDD engagement is principal-led and delivered within agreed timelines. Fees from AED 20,000.
Request an FDD Proposal →The GCC M&A market recorded $102.1 billion across 685 deals in 2025, a 26% surge year-on-year. The UAE alone attracted 49% of total MENA inbound deal volume. Cross-border transactions represented 54% of all activity – and that number is accelerating. But behind the headline figures is a nuanced story about sector concentration, deal complexity, and the structural forces reshaping where capital flows in the region.
The largest single deal of 2025 – the $16.5B acquisition of Borouge by OMV and Borealis – underscores that energy and petrochemicals remain the region's anchor deal sector. But the nature of energy deals is changing. The pure upstream consolidation plays of the previous decade have given way to more complex transactions involving downstream processing, petrochemicals integration, and clean energy infrastructure. Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 continues to drive energy diversification, creating M&A opportunities in renewable energy, hydrogen, and energy storage.
Technology is the fastest-growing deal sector in the GCC by both deal count and transaction sophistication. Abu Dhabi's positioning as an AI and technology hub – underpinned by sovereign capital from Mubadala, ADQ, and G42 – is driving deal activity in data infrastructure, AI enablement, fintech, and healthtech.
"Technology deals in the GCC are no longer a niche. They are central to the region's economic transformation, and the financial complexity of these transactions is increasing rapidly."
For mid-market technology M&A (AED 5M–200M), this creates both opportunity and complexity. Acquirers need advisors who understand SaaS metrics, ARR quality, and technology platform valuation – not just traditional financial due diligence. This is an area where generalist advisors frequently fall short.
Saudi Arabia's healthcare privatisation programme, accelerated by Vision 2030, generated an estimated $3.2B in deal activity in 2025. Hospital groups, diagnostic chains, and pharmaceutical distributors are active consolidation targets as the Kingdom moves to reduce dependence on public healthcare provision. The UAE's healthcare sector is seeing consolidation among mid-market operators as regional platforms scale to compete with international groups.
The Emirates NBD investment in RBL Bank ($4.4B) was the flagship example of a broader trend: GCC financial institutions deploying capital into South and Southeast Asian markets. For mid-market deals, the India-GCC corridor is generating significant cross-border M&A activity in logistics, food processing, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods – with both inbound and outbound deal flow accelerating.
Corvian Advisory provides GCC-focused M&A deal advisory for mid-market transactions from AED 5M to AED 500M. Buy-side, sell-side, and cross-border mandates across UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the wider GCC.
Discuss Your Transaction →The UAE is experiencing one of the most significant generational transfers of family business wealth in its history. Businesses built over 30 to 40 years by founders from South Asia, the Levant, and the UAE itself are reaching an inflection point – the founder generation is stepping back, and decisions about succession, sale, or restructuring need to be made. The quality of the valuation underpinning those decisions will shape outcomes for the entire family for decades.
The problem is that most family business owners receive valuations that are either wildly optimistic from brokers who want a mandate, or deliberately conservative from sophisticated buyers who want to acquire at a discount. Without an independent, credentialled valuation that the owner can defend, the negotiation is asymmetric from the start.
Business brokers in the UAE are paid on success – typically 5–10% of sale price for smaller transactions. Their incentive is to get a mandate, not to provide an accurate valuation. The result is frequent over-valuation to win the assignment, followed by a lengthy period on the market, price reductions, and eventual sale at or below true market value. The owner has lost time, confidentiality, and arrived at the same price through a far more painful process.
Sophisticated institutional buyers have their own valuation teams. When a seller approaches a transaction without an independent valuation, the buyer's analysis becomes the reference point for negotiation. Without a credentialled independent valuation to anchor their position, sellers have no leverage to push back.
"An independent valuation by a CFA charterholder is not a luxury for UAE family business owners – it is the single most important document you can have going into any sale, financing, or succession process."
A properly prepared independent valuation provides three things that change the transaction dynamic. First, it gives the owner a credible, methodology-backed anchor for their negotiating position. Second, it identifies value drivers and value destroyers the owner may not have been aware of, allowing pre-sale optimisation. Third, it provides a defensible number for internal family discussions about equity distribution, buyouts, or succession planning.
For family businesses with mixed asset portfolios – operating businesses alongside real estate, financial investments, and minority stakes – a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) analysis is often essential. The combined value of the parts is frequently different from the market's implied valuation of the group as a whole, and understanding that gap is important for structuring any transaction.
Corvian Advisory provides independent business valuations for UAE family businesses contemplating sale, succession, financing, or restructuring. Prepared by a CFA charterholder. Fees from AED 10,000.
Request a Valuation →The India-GCC trade and investment corridor is one of the most active and fastest-growing cross-border deal environments in the world. The UAE is the largest trade partner for India in the Arab world. GCC investment in India hit record levels in 2025, with deals in fintech, healthcare, logistics, food processing, and consumer goods. Indian conglomerates are building GCC platforms. GCC family offices are acquiring Indian manufacturing and technology businesses. The deal flow is real, the opportunity is significant, and the failure rate is higher than it should be.
India's foreign direct investment regulations, sector-specific ownership restrictions, FEMA compliance requirements, and Competition Commission of India (CCI) approval thresholds are significantly more complex than most GCC acquirers expect. Deals that look straightforward often stall in regulatory approvals – not because they are blocked, but because the acquirer did not build regulatory timeline into the deal schedule. Transactions with an Indian component should budget 4–8 weeks for regulatory approvals beyond the standard deal timeline.
GCC acquirers applying GCC sector multiples to Indian businesses frequently either overpay (because Indian EBITDA multiples have not fully corrected) or underbid (because they are applying infrastructure-style multiples to a high-growth software business). Local market calibration, using India-specific transaction data, is essential.
"In cross-border deals, financial due diligence is more important, not less. Accounting standards, revenue recognition practices, and working capital norms differ materially between India and the GCC."
Indian private company accounts, while audited under Indian GAAP or Ind AS, frequently contain related-party transactions, off-balance-sheet arrangements, and revenue recognition practices that require specific diligence. Working capital norms differ significantly from GCC markets – trade payable cycles are longer, receivable quality varies by sector, and inventory valuation methods affect reported margins. An FDD conducted by an advisor without specific Indian transaction experience will miss these nuances.
Cross-border M&A between India and the GCC involves navigating withholding tax on dividends, capital gains treatment under the India-UAE DTAA, and the structure of the acquisition vehicle. Getting the structure wrong at the outset – or failing to account for it in deal economics – can create significant tax leakage that was not modelled in the acquisition case.
The India-GCC deal corridor requires advisors who understand both markets. A purely Indian advisor may not know GCC buyer expectations or how GCC family offices make decisions. A purely GCC advisor may not understand Indian regulatory nuance, Indian accounting standards, or Indian private market dynamics. The best outcomes come from engaging an advisor with direct experience in both markets and a network in both geographies.
Corvian Advisory has specific experience in the India-GCC cross-border deal corridor, including financial due diligence, valuation, and deal advisory on transactions in both directions. Mandates from AED 5M.
Discuss a Cross-Border Deal →In 1975, tangible assets represented approximately 83% of the S&P 500's total market value. By 2025, intangible assets represented approximately 90%. The GCC market lags this trend, but it is following it – particularly as technology, pharma, and consumer brand acquisitions accelerate across the region. When a GCC technology platform acquires a SaaS business, the transaction value is overwhelmingly determined by the value of the acquired technology, customer relationships, brand, and proprietary data.
In GCC transactions, intangible asset value typically falls into three broad categories. Technology and IP assets – including patents (registered and pending), proprietary software, algorithms, and databases – are the primary value driver in technology and pharma acquisitions. Customer and market-related intangibles – customer lists, contracts, distribution agreements – are central to consumer and services deals. Brand and marketing-related intangibles – trade names, trademarks, domain names – are critical in consumer goods, healthcare, and retail transactions.
"Most business valuation reports in the GCC either ignore intangible assets entirely or value them as a residual. This approach consistently misprices the most important component of modern deal value."
The most common approach to intangible assets in UAE and GCC business valuations is to either ignore them (treating the business as an EBITDA multiple story) or compute goodwill as a residual – what is left after tangible assets are valued. Both approaches are fundamentally inadequate for any transaction involving meaningful IP, brand value, or customer relationships. The correct approach is to value each significant intangible category independently, using the appropriate methodology for each.
After a transaction closes, IFRS 3 (Business Combinations) requires the acquirer to allocate the purchase price across identified intangible assets and goodwill. This purchase price allocation (PPA) affects reported earnings for years post-closing – through amortisation of identified intangibles – and is subject to audit scrutiny. Acquirers who do not conduct rigorous intangible asset valuations pre-close frequently face challenges at PPA, with auditors requiring revisions that affect reported financial results.
Corvian Advisory provides specialist intangible asset valuations including patent, brand, trademark, customer relationship, and technology platform valuations – IVS-compliant and prepared for transaction, PPA, and regulatory purposes.
Request an Intangible Valuation →Choosing the right M&A advisor in the UAE is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner makes in a transaction. The wrong choice – whether a generalist broker, an overpriced Big 4 team that delegates to juniors, or an advisor without genuine transaction experience – will cost you time, confidentiality, and ultimately money.
The UAE deal advisory market can be broadly divided into four categories: global top-tier transaction advisory teams within the Big 4 and international networks; regional investment banks focused on capital markets; boutique M&A advisory firms; and business brokers and online platforms. Each has a place in the market, but they are not interchangeable.
The Big 4 transaction advisory teams bring institutional credibility, global networks, and the ability to mobilise large teams for complex multi-jurisdictional transactions. For deals above USD 200M involving listed companies, they are often the right choice. For mid-market UAE transactions (AED 5M–500M), the Big 4 model has structural disadvantages: fees are priced for large transactions, and the senior partner who pitches the mandate is typically not the person who works on it. Day-to-day work is done by associates and managers. At Corvian Advisory, every mandate is personally led by a CFA-qualified, Big 4-trained principal advisor from signing to closing.
"The question to ask any deal advisor is not 'who is your team?' but 'who will personally work on my deal, from mandate to closing?' The answer matters more than the firm's brand."
The most relevant credentials for a deal advisor are the CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) charter, CA (Chartered Accountant) qualification, and Big 4 transaction experience. The CFA charter specifically denotes rigorous training in financial analysis, valuation, and portfolio management – directly applicable to deal advisory and due diligence. A CFA charterholder has passed three successive six-hour exams with a cumulative pass rate under 20%.
Deal advisory fees come in three structures: pure success fees (common for brokers), retainer plus success fee (standard for boutique M&A advisors), and fixed fees (appropriate for FDD, valuation, and defined-scope work). For sell-side mandates on mid-market transactions, a well-structured fee arrangement typically includes a modest retainer and a success fee of 1.5–3% of enterprise value at closing. Any advisor who is unwilling to clearly state their fee structure before engagement is a red flag. At Corvian Advisory, all fees are agreed and documented in the engagement letter before any work commences.
Corvian Advisory is a CFA-qualified, Big 4-trained boutique deal advisory firm providing M&A advisory, financial due diligence, and business valuation across the UAE and GCC. All mandates are principal-led from start to closing.
Discuss Your Advisory Needs →Business valuations in Dubai and the UAE are needed for a wide range of purposes: sale or acquisition transactions, partnership disputes and buyouts, Golden Visa applications, DIFC and ADGM regulatory requirements, bank financing, insurance purposes, and estate planning. The purpose of the valuation significantly affects the appropriate methodology, the standards to which the report should be prepared, and the credentials required of the valuing advisor.
The most relevant professional qualifications for business valuation work in the UAE are the CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) charter, the RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) qualification (particularly for asset and property valuations), and the CA (Chartered Accountant) qualification. For transaction and M&A purposes, the CFA charter is the most directly relevant qualification – CFA charterholders have received specific training in DCF modelling, market multiples analysis, and financial statement analysis, the precise toolkit required for a credible business valuation.
The International Valuation Standards (IVS) issued by the IVSC are the globally recognised framework for business valuations. IVS-compliant valuations are accepted by most UAE banks, regulators, and courts. For listed company transactions or DIFC/ADGM matters, compliance with IFRS 13 (Fair Value Measurement) is also typically required.
"A valuation report that does not state the standards to which it was prepared, the qualifications of the preparer, and the methodology applied in explicit detail is not a professional valuation – it is an opinion dressed up as analysis."
The cost of an independent business valuation in Dubai depends on complexity, purpose, and advisor credentials. For a straightforward operating business with clean financials: AED 10,000–20,000. For a complex business or group requiring multiple valuation methods: AED 20,000–50,000. For specialised intangible asset valuations: AED 15,000–40,000 depending on the number and complexity of assets. Be cautious of very low-cost valuations – a credible independent business valuation priced below AED 5,000 is almost certainly not prepared by a qualified advisor using a rigorous methodology, and is unlikely to withstand scrutiny in a transaction or regulatory context.
At Corvian Advisory, all business valuations are prepared personally by our principal advisor – a CFA charterholder with Big 4 transaction advisory background. We use DCF, EV/EBITDA multiples based on current market data, precedent transaction analysis, and where appropriate, NAV and SOTP methodology. All reports are prepared in compliance with IVS standards and IFRS 13 where applicable, and are documented to a standard that withstands challenge in negotiation, due diligence, and regulatory review.
Corvian Advisory provides independent business valuations across the UAE and GCC from AED 10,000. All valuations are IVS-compliant and prepared by a CFA charterholder. Turnaround from 2 weeks.
Request a Valuation Proposal →Direct answers to the questions business owners, founders, and investors ask us most, before they read our full guides.
Selling a business in Dubai involves five stages: pre-sale preparation, independent valuation, CIM preparation, structured buyer outreach under NDA, and negotiation through to closing. The full process typically takes 4 to 8 months.
Business valuation uses three primary approaches: income (DCF), market (EV/EBITDA multiples), and asset (NAV). UAE valuations must follow IVS standards to be accepted by banks and courts. Costs range from AED 10K to AED 50K+.
UAE FDD covers quality of earnings, EBITDA normalisation, working capital, net debt, and contingent liabilities, plus UAE Corporate Tax, VAT, WPS payroll, EOSB liability, and free zone structure review.
Five key inflection points: preparing for a capital raise (6-12 months before), approaching a transaction exit, monthly revenue exceeding AED 2M with inadequate reporting, a bank or investor requiring board-level oversight, or a finance function in distress. Retainers: AED 8K-20K/month.
Healthcare 5-8x; technology and SaaS 4-8x; logistics 4-6x; F&B and retail 2-4x; professional services 3-5x; manufacturing 4-7x. These reflect indicative GCC mid-market data, not public company benchmarks.
A typical mid-market sale takes 4 to 9 months: pre-sale preparation (4-8 weeks), buyer outreach (4-6 weeks), offers and shortlisting (2-4 weeks), buyer due diligence (3-6 weeks), negotiation (2-4 weeks), and legal documentation (4-8 weeks).
QoE identifies which reported earnings are genuinely recurring and sustainable, versus inflated by one-time items or related-party transactions. Common UAE adjustments include above-market owner compensation and non-arm's-length transactions.
The UAE's 9% corporate tax has changed M&A due diligence: projections must reflect post-tax cashflows, Free Zone qualifying income status must be verified, and transfer pricing is now a diligence item.
The right advisor is senior-led, holds relevant credentials (CFA, CA, ACCA), has deep UAE and GCC market knowledge, provides independent advice with no conflicts, and publishes transparent pricing.
A CIM presents the business to potential buyers: executive summary, company overview, business model, market opportunity, financial performance, management team, deal structure, and key risks.
The India-GCC corridor covers cross-border deal flow between India and the GCC in both directions, driven by trade growth and the India-UAE CEPA agreement, with key sectors in logistics, food processing, and technology.
PMI aligns the acquired business's people, systems, and operations post-closing, and is where most GCC deal value is realised or destroyed. UAE-specific issues include free zone consolidation and WPS payroll alignment.
Follow Corvian Advisory on LinkedIn for deal market analysis, valuation commentary, and GCC M&A intelligence published weekly.